Non-pdontised ranked belief change
نویسندگان
چکیده
Traditional accounts of belief change have been crificised for placing undue emphasis on the new belief provided as input. A recent proposal to address Such issues is the framework of Ghose and Goebel for non-pdofitised belief change based on default theories [8]. A novel feature of this approach is the introduction of disbeliefs alongside beliefs which allows for a view of belief contraction as independently useful, instead of just being seen as an intermediate step in the process of belief revision. The Ghose-Goebel approach is, however, restrictive in assuming a linear ordenng of reliability on the received inputs. In this paper, we extend the Ghose-Goebel framework by replacing the linear ordering with a preference ranking on inputs from which a total preorder on inputs can be induced. This extension bnngs along with it the problem of dealing with inputs of equal rank, a situation that cannot occur in the Ghose-Goebel setup. We provide a semantic solution to this problem which contains, as a special case, AGM belief change on closed theories.
منابع مشابه
Non-monotonic Reasoning and the Reversibility of Belief Change
Traditional approaches to non-monotonic reasoning fail to satisfy a number of plausible axioms for belief revision and suffer from conceptual difficulties as well. Recent work on ranked preferential models (RPMs) promises to overcome some of these difficulties. Here we show that RPMs are not adequate to handle iterated belief change. Specifically, we show that RPMs do not always allow for the r...
متن کاملNon-prioritised ranked belief change
Traditional accounts of belief change have often been criticised for placing undue emphasis on the new belief provided as input. A recent proposal to address such issues is Ghose and Goebel’s [6] framework for non-prioritised belief change based on default theories. A novel feature of their approach is the introduction of disbeliefs alongside beliefs which allows for a view of belief contractio...
متن کاملNon-Prioritized Ranked Belief Change
Traditional accounts of belief change have been criticised for placing undue emphasis on the new belief provided as input. A recent proposal to address such issues is the framework of Ghose and Goebel for non-prioritised belief change based on default theories [8]. A novel feature of this approach is the introduction of disbeliefs alongside beliefs which allows for a view of belief contraction ...
متن کاملBelief Revision, Conditional Logic and Nonmonotonic Reasoning
We consider the connections between belief revision, conditional logic and nonmonotonic reasoning, using as a foundation the approach to theory change developed by Alchourrón, Gärdenfors and Makinson (the AGM approach). This is first generalized to allow the iteration of theory change operations to capture the dynamics of epistemic states according to a principle of minimal change of entrenchme...
متن کاملBelief Change in a Preferential Non-monotonic Framework
Belief change and non-monotonic reasoning are usually viewed as two sides of the same coin, with results showing that one can formally be defined in terms of the other. In this paper we show that we can also integrate the two formalisms by studying belief change within a (preferential) non-monotonic framework. This integration relies heavily on the identification of the monotonic core of a non-...
متن کامل